The Missing Measure in Third-Party Information Risk
Most third-party risk programs can prove activity. Far fewer can measure residual exposure consistently.
-
- Replace Inconsistent Risk Interpretation: Questionnaires, certifications, cyber scores, and monitoring tools provide valuable inputs, but they do not always create a comparable view of residual risk.
Establish a Trusted Measurement Foundation: Standardized, assured measurement helps organizations evaluate third-party exposure consistently across vendors, reviewers, and business functions.
Support Better Risk Decisions: Comparable residual-risk insight enables organizations to prioritize vendors, govern exceptions, benchmark exposure, and make more confident decisions at scale.
- Replace Inconsistent Risk Interpretation: Questionnaires, certifications, cyber scores, and monitoring tools provide valuable inputs, but they do not always create a comparable view of residual risk.
- Consistent measurement is not just another risk process, it is the foundation for governable third-party information risk.
- In a new HITRUST paper, The Missing Measure in Third-Party Information Risk, Founder and Executive Chairman Dan Nutkis explores why third-party risk needs a standardized and assured way to convert fragmented evidence into decision-ready insight.
Third-Party Risk Cannot Be Governed Without Consistent Measurement
Learn why fragmented assessments and inconsistent risk interpretation leave organizations without a clear view of residual exposure in
The Missing Measure in Third-Party Information Risk.